MORE MOTORING OPINIONS: The Future of the Hybrid Vehicle | The Business of Busyness | Is The 2015 Ford Mustang the Right Stablemate?
Well, first things first. The crossover segment into which the X6 falls is a bit of a mishmash of vehicular categories: it fills a supposed need for a vehicle that sits lower to the ground than a truck (thereby driving more like a car), has room for more than five, possesses four driven wheels for unsavory conditions, and good gas mileage. Against all odds, the crossover has become the fastest growing automotive segment in existence; in fact, according to IHS Automotive, 36.5 percent of new vehicles registered in the U.S. through May have been crossovers or SUVs, compared to 35.4 percent for sedans, which has long dominated new vehicle registrations. It’s a surprise, but it makes sense; the average American family demands room, a slightly higher-than-average driving position, and fuel economy, and CUVs ably meet those demands — with the notable exception of the BMW X6, an ugly, $60,800 status symbol.
There’s virtually nothing attractive about the X6, save for a vague combat boot masculinity. It has a blunt fascia, a too-tall greenhouse that tapers down hard in the back seat and a rear that resembles tiramisu. And the inside doesn’t fare much better; its smaller, lighter brother, the BMW X3, has more legroom and cargo space — and the X6’s greenhouse will make sure only your vertically challenged friends are comfortable in the backseat.
CUVs ably meet the demands of American families — with the notable exception of the BMW X6, a $60,800 status symbol.
Under the hood, the X6 and X3 are identical. They use the same twin turbo inline-six engine. The X6 is like a performance-minded anvil; you can toss it around like no other 5,000-pound vehicle. But it’s not a sports car, so what’s the point? It costs a full $5k more than the X3; why would anyone pay that much more for the same power, less room and worse looks in a car segment that doesn’t completely make sense?
Well in America, amid all of our impractical car wants, the most impractical of the lot are status and individualism. BMW’s “Launchfilm” for the refreshed model clearly shows their target market: well-to-do older men who want to drive something noticeable. The X6 looks like no other crossover out there (except its new baby brother, the X4!), and, for all its foibles and shortcomings, it stands out in a sea of other crossovers for its posh status amongst German CUVs. Its base price is $60,800 — so you know it’ll be well past the $70k mark optioned out. BMW’s motto for the car is “More Jet. Less Set.” The mien is true, if not the implication that the car has less to do with affluence and wealth.
The X6 doesn’t do anything particularly well, other than draining your wallet. But that Roundel badge goes a long way in projecting socio-economic status. And it seems BMW’s onto something with the idea of a “luxe” CUV; it’s been rumored that Audi has an X6 competitor in the works, a clear indication that success isn’t proportional to sense. This strange formula — a bloated, heavy, impractical fastback crossover — is a tail that wags the dog, but the dog seems content to let it happen.
See a guy driving a blacked-out X6 M, and you begin to understand that there are folks with too much money and no sense of taste or driving acumen. But Americans want to have their cake and eat it, too. They want status, power and the ability to thumb their noses at practicality. Frankly, this is why the strictly suburban SUV was so successful in the first place, and why the X6 will continue to sell well in the States. It’s a statement on the behalf of the owner, who has clearly paid far too much for far too little.