<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Letter From The Editor: Lets Get Back To Basics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/02/18/letter-from-the-editor-lets-get-back-to-basics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/02/18/letter-from-the-editor-lets-get-back-to-basics/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Yang</title>
		<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/02/18/letter-from-the-editor-lets-get-back-to-basics/#comment-65357</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gearpatrol.com/blog/?p=4436#comment-65357</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the affirmation guys. There&#039;s a lot of other men out there who&#039;ve shared similar sentiments directly with the writers.

It definitely helps provide justification to what we&#039;re doing, even if it is a work in progress. The challenge is &quot;real world&quot; is incredibly subjective to guys. We&#039;ll continue to try and bring into the fold a variety of perspectives - some will be deplored, some will be corroborate, hopefully all will be respected.

Oh, and we&#039;ll have some fun with it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the affirmation guys. There&#8217;s a lot of other men out there who&#8217;ve shared similar sentiments directly with the writers.</p>
<p>It definitely helps provide justification to what we&#8217;re doing, even if it is a work in progress. The challenge is &#8220;real world&#8221; is incredibly subjective to guys. We&#8217;ll continue to try and bring into the fold a variety of perspectives &#8211; some will be deplored, some will be corroborate, hopefully all will be respected.</p>
<p>Oh, and we&#8217;ll have some fun with it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/02/18/letter-from-the-editor-lets-get-back-to-basics/#comment-65326</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gearpatrol.com/blog/?p=4436#comment-65326</guid>
		<description>Great post, I love this about gear patrol. I am in one of the most expensive colleges in the country and am constantly looking for a bargain. You guys are very good at being well rounded and providing both the style but also the bargain. Those don&#039;t always go hand in hand but you have found the appropriate balance here. Ultimately, I think having more money over the long term to purchase more substantial items is more important then getting the latest gadget or latest style. Thanks for having a real world perspective.

-Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, I love this about gear patrol. I am in one of the most expensive colleges in the country and am constantly looking for a bargain. You guys are very good at being well rounded and providing both the style but also the bargain. Those don&#8217;t always go hand in hand but you have found the appropriate balance here. Ultimately, I think having more money over the long term to purchase more substantial items is more important then getting the latest gadget or latest style. Thanks for having a real world perspective.</p>
<p>-Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/02/18/letter-from-the-editor-lets-get-back-to-basics/#comment-65290</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gearpatrol.com/blog/?p=4436#comment-65290</guid>
		<description>One of the  things I really like about this site is its realistic perspective... Gear Patrol seems to understand that not every man if going to go out and purchase a $2000 suit, $500 shoes and a $14000 watch just to put together an outfit.  Sure, expensive luxuries are nice, but so are shrewd bargains that look like a million bucks!  Please keep your down to earth perspective... the world doesn&#039;t need another GQ!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the  things I really like about this site is its realistic perspective&#8230; Gear Patrol seems to understand that not every man if going to go out and purchase a $2000 suit, $500 shoes and a $14000 watch just to put together an outfit.  Sure, expensive luxuries are nice, but so are shrewd bargains that look like a million bucks!  Please keep your down to earth perspective&#8230; the world doesn&#8217;t need another GQ!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic

Served from: gearpatrol.com @ 2012-02-09 21:16:14 -->
