<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PF Flyers: Fly Style High Tops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/03/31/pf-flyers-fly-style-high-tops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/03/31/pf-flyers-fly-style-high-tops/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Bowers</title>
		<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/03/31/pf-flyers-fly-style-high-tops/#comment-68188</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gearpatrol.com/blog/?p=5945#comment-68188</guid>
		<description>I would tend to agree with you. Personally though that disparity is worth it simply because they are a bit more unique than the Purcells. It is funnyhow many people confuse Converse with PF though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would tend to agree with you. Personally though that disparity is worth it simply because they are a bit more unique than the Purcells. It is funnyhow many people confuse Converse with PF though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbowers</title>
		<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/03/31/pf-flyers-fly-style-high-tops/#comment-68122</link>
		<dc:creator>bbowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gearpatrol.com/blog/?p=5945#comment-68122</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

Thanks for the tip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>Thanks for the tip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Soucy</title>
		<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/03/31/pf-flyers-fly-style-high-tops/#comment-68112</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Soucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gearpatrol.com/blog/?p=5945#comment-68112</guid>
		<description>These are made by New Balance - if you happen to have a factory outlet around (not sure if they reach beyond the Northeast) - be on the lookout for these sneakers at deep discounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are made by New Balance &#8211; if you happen to have a factory outlet around (not sure if they reach beyond the Northeast) &#8211; be on the lookout for these sneakers at deep discounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy H</title>
		<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/03/31/pf-flyers-fly-style-high-tops/#comment-68107</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gearpatrol.com/blog/?p=5945#comment-68107</guid>
		<description>Very Nice Choice! I have the the low top &quot;number 5&#039;s&quot; and have gotten some great wear out of them.


They give my converse Jack Purcells a run for their money, however, I&#039;d say the quality on the flyers is a step lower, and the price a step higher, than my converse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very Nice Choice! I have the the low top &#8220;number 5&#8242;s&#8221; and have gotten some great wear out of them.</p>
<p>They give my converse Jack Purcells a run for their money, however, I&#8217;d say the quality on the flyers is a step lower, and the price a step higher, than my converse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic

Served from: gearpatrol.com @ 2012-02-09 22:08:20 -->
