<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Your Gym Routine Doing More Harm Then Good?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/04/08/is-your-gym-routine-doing-more-harm-then-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/04/08/is-your-gym-routine-doing-more-harm-then-good/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Gaffney</title>
		<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/04/08/is-your-gym-routine-doing-more-harm-then-good/#comment-69301</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Gaffney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gearpatrol.com/blog/?p=5887#comment-69301</guid>
		<description>Patrick I completely agree with you on the cardio. I forsake long distance cardio a long time ago and do intense interval workouts, sprint work, and even old school stuff like suicides. For a cardio machine you can&#039;t beat a Concept II Rower or a Schwinn AirDyne, they will own you. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick I completely agree with you on the cardio. I forsake long distance cardio a long time ago and do intense interval workouts, sprint work, and even old school stuff like suicides. For a cardio machine you can&#039;t beat a Concept II Rower or a Schwinn AirDyne, they will own you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linus</title>
		<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/04/08/is-your-gym-routine-doing-more-harm-then-good/#comment-69195</link>
		<dc:creator>Linus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gearpatrol.com/blog/?p=5887#comment-69195</guid>
		<description>A great alternative to monotonous treadmill runs is wind sprints, which are particularly useful training for sports like basketball and soccer.  If you&#039;ve got access to a basketball court, try &lt;a href="http://www.ehow.com/video_2355018_basketball-conditioning-suicide-drills.html" target="_blank"&gt;suicides&lt;/a&gt; (just be careful with your ankles!).  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great alternative to monotonous treadmill runs is wind sprints, which are particularly useful training for sports like basketball and soccer.  If you&#039;ve got access to a basketball court, try <a href="http://www.ehow.com/video_2355018_basketball-conditioning-suicide-drills.html" target="_blank">suicides</a> (just be careful with your ankles!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Tuttle</title>
		<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/04/08/is-your-gym-routine-doing-more-harm-then-good/#comment-69075</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Tuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gearpatrol.com/blog/?p=5887#comment-69075</guid>
		<description>Logan -   
  
Losing weight is a chemical/hormonal process.  Don&#39;t think of the calories burned while working out as necessarily the most important measure of a workout&#39;s value.  It&#39;s the 23 hours after and leading up to the next workout where your body really go to work.    
  
Your body is the same design as early man.  Back then your body never knew when the next meal was coming so it held onto fat at pretty much all costs.  Muscles produces more energy than fat when burned so your body mixes fat and muscle to sustain your endurance energy needs.  The same concept is true of your glycogen levels (or shorter bust energy).  If you needed to travel miles to find food your body would hold back most of your glycogen reserve just in case you had to run away from a saber-tooth tiger.  When you eat after a workout your body&#39;s first priority is to refill that glycogen tank (just in case you have to run for your life again).  If you don&#39;t adequatly burn glycogen during a workout then the leftover calories you eat will simple be converted to fat for storage, no matter how healthy those calories were.  Everything your body does, it does in the name of self preservation.  
  
If you&#39;d like to read more on this one website I&#39;m fond of is &lt;a href="http://lifespotlight.com/fitness/2008/10/02/is-your-exercise-keeping-you-fat/" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Life Spotlight&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  Although most any fitness or health website or magazine will have similar articles. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logan -   </p>
<p>Losing weight is a chemical/hormonal process.  Don&#39;t think of the calories burned while working out as necessarily the most important measure of a workout&#39;s value.  It&#39;s the 23 hours after and leading up to the next workout where your body really go to work.    </p>
<p>Your body is the same design as early man.  Back then your body never knew when the next meal was coming so it held onto fat at pretty much all costs.  Muscles produces more energy than fat when burned so your body mixes fat and muscle to sustain your endurance energy needs.  The same concept is true of your glycogen levels (or shorter bust energy).  If you needed to travel miles to find food your body would hold back most of your glycogen reserve just in case you had to run away from a saber-tooth tiger.  When you eat after a workout your body&#39;s first priority is to refill that glycogen tank (just in case you have to run for your life again).  If you don&#39;t adequatly burn glycogen during a workout then the leftover calories you eat will simple be converted to fat for storage, no matter how healthy those calories were.  Everything your body does, it does in the name of self preservation.  </p>
<p>If you&#39;d like to read more on this one website I&#39;m fond of is <a href="http://lifespotlight.com/fitness/2008/10/02/is-your-exercise-keeping-you-fat/" rel="nofollow"><strong>Life Spotlight</strong></a>.  Although most any fitness or health website or magazine will have similar articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan P.</title>
		<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/04/08/is-your-gym-routine-doing-more-harm-then-good/#comment-69064</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gearpatrol.com/blog/?p=5887#comment-69064</guid>
		<description>Looks like some good information, but I was unsure about some points in the &#34;Don&#039;t Take it too Easy&#34; segment.  Obviously, the harder you work out (the faster you run, the heavier the weights, the shorter the breaks between sets), the faster you will burn calories.  Now I&#039;m certainly no doctor or health expert (and it would improve your piece to quote an expert or two), but I was a little skeptical that harder workouts somehow burn fat (or &#34;glycogen reserves&#34;) whereas less intense workouts burn/break down muscles.  It sounds like the myths that running a mile burns more calories than walking or eating at night is worse for you than eating at any other part of the day (see: &lt;a href="http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/18/medical-myths-for-the-holiday-season/?scp=10&amp;sq=health%20myths&amp;st=cse)." target="_blank"&gt;http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/18/medical-...&lt;/a&gt;  Actually, running or walking the same distance burn just about the same number of calories and it doesn&#039;t matter when you eat food - eat more than you burn any time and your weight goes up and vice versa.  Following that logic, working out harder would only burn calories faster (and build more muscle if you are doing resistance training) than lighter cardio, not burn fat vs. muscle or one kind of energy vs. another. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like some good information, but I was unsure about some points in the &quot;Don&#039;t Take it too Easy&quot; segment.  Obviously, the harder you work out (the faster you run, the heavier the weights, the shorter the breaks between sets), the faster you will burn calories.  Now I&#039;m certainly no doctor or health expert (and it would improve your piece to quote an expert or two), but I was a little skeptical that harder workouts somehow burn fat (or &quot;glycogen reserves&quot;) whereas less intense workouts burn/break down muscles.  It sounds like the myths that running a mile burns more calories than walking or eating at night is worse for you than eating at any other part of the day (see: <a href="http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/18/medical-myths-for-the-holiday-season/?scp=10&amp;sq=health%20myths&amp;st=cse)." target="_blank"></a><a href="http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/18/medical-.." rel="nofollow">http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/18/medical-..</a>.  Actually, running or walking the same distance burn just about the same number of calories and it doesn&#039;t matter when you eat food - eat more than you burn any time and your weight goes up and vice versa.  Following that logic, working out harder would only burn calories faster (and build more muscle if you are doing resistance training) than lighter cardio, not burn fat vs. muscle or one kind of energy vs. another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RogD</title>
		<link>http://gearpatrol.com/blog/2009/04/08/is-your-gym-routine-doing-more-harm-then-good/#comment-69054</link>
		<dc:creator>RogD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gearpatrol.com/blog/?p=5887#comment-69054</guid>
		<description>Great post Patrick, thanks! You know now you mention it my hearing isn&#039;t the same as it used to be... and I often wondered- without doing anything about it- if the volume of my buds vs the volume of the bad techno in the gym&#039;s speakers was ruining my ears. Great tip, thanks! Another thing: can you or anyone please recommend a good book that explains an easy to understand and follow diet regime for working out? That would be really helpful...Cheers! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Patrick, thanks! You know now you mention it my hearing isn&#039;t the same as it used to be&#8230; and I often wondered- without doing anything about it- if the volume of my buds vs the volume of the bad techno in the gym&#039;s speakers was ruining my ears. Great tip, thanks! Another thing: can you or anyone please recommend a good book that explains an easy to understand and follow diet regime for working out? That would be really helpful&#8230;Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
