Electronics

Man’s love of electronics knows no bounds - behold the best.

Entertainment

Our book, movie, music, game, and website recommendations.

gear girls

Women. Impossibly beautiful women. Need we say more?

Guides & Resources

How-to’s, techniques, and insider tips straight from the gear gurus.

Health & Fitness

Gear to be healthier. Gear to be fit. Tips too.

Home

A man’s home is his kingdom. It should be well-equipped.

Lifestyle

Food, drink, and travel: three pillars of better living for men.

Sports & Outdoors

Gear for courts, trails, slopes, and courses.

Style & Grooming

Men’s fashion, grooming, watches, and accessories.

Vehicles

Whether by land, sea, or air, a man must get from point A to B.

Home » Electronics, Gaming, TV & Video

Panasonic TC-P42X1 Viera Plasma HDTV

Why Less Is More When Shopping For A Whopping New TV

By Dusty Overby on Mon, Jun 8, 2009 In-Depth Review
| Email To A Friend | Stumble It! | 21 Comments
(7)

panasonic-tc-p42x1-viera-plasma-hdtv

Since its commercial deployment over half a century ago, no bit of household technology has enraptured the attention and the desires of man like the television. After all, we are exceptionally visual creatures. A man must love his TV; if not, he is genetically conditioned to go out (hunt) and get one (gather) that he does. It’s a biological imperative that a sub-par viewing experience is simply intolerable.

That said, seeking an upgrade in the TV department may be a philosophical no-brainer, but it’s still a complex decision-making process with lots of choices available. Not to long ago, we made our recommendations for HDTV selections at a variety of price points. Since then, many manufactures have unleashed their 2009 line-ups, and many are featuring the latest in flat-panel technology. Obviously, it’s the stuff of unbridled technolust but often comes bundled with a price tag that’s out of my (and maybe your) reach. Yuck.

I needed to find the answer to a common pre-purchase question; I needed to know, “what is the least that I can spend to get the most of what I want?” I found the answer in Panasonic’s new line of reliable and refined plasma HDTVs. Having spent some time with the TC-P42X1, I feel just fine getting my fix from tried and true plasma technology. Hit the jump to hear my take on the good (there’s lots), the bad (not much), and the ugly (actually, this thing is freakin’ beautiful).

First, let’s talk about the tech. Just because plasma technology didn’t debut at this year’s CES, doesn’t mean that it can’t please videophiles and casual observers alike. In fact, when it comes to combining picture quality and price, you simply won’t find a better option. The TC-P42X1 and it’s big brother the TC-P50X1 are both members of Panasonic’s plasma lineup that offer a 720p resolution. Now, I realize that many retailers want you to think that a 1080p set is the only HDTV worth buying these days, but I aim to free you of that notion. That’s. A. Lie. At these screen sizes (50″ or less), you simply can’t tell the difference. However, your wallet can; don’t pay $200 more for a feature that won’t benefit you. Instead, spend that cash on some video games, a night out on the town, or producing and airing a local cablevision spot promoting the wonders of Gear Patrol.

Retailers want you to think that a 1080p set is the only HDTV worth buying these days, but I aim to free you of that notion. That’s. A. Lie. At these screen sizes, you simply can’t tell the difference. However, your wallet can; don’t pay $200 more for a feature that won’t benefit you.

When I’m looking at a flat-panel television, the primary attributes that I’m concerned with (save for an resolution appropriate to the screen size) are motion clarity and black levels. The TC-P42X1 (and the entire Panasonic line, for that matter) have these concerns assuaged both quantitatively and practically. To the former, this Panny boasts a 600Hz Sub-field drive which keeps everything in focus during fast-moving scenes like those found in movies or while watching sports.

To the latter concern, this unit really excels in the black is black is black department, with its 30,000:1 contrast ratio sounding impressive and looking even better. I’ve been rocking an LCD unit from a very popular manufacturer for the last few years and, though I’m generally happy with it’s performance, it’s blacks have always been less than stellar. Panasonic’s plasmas are in a whole other league if your past experience is anything like mine. Some people complain about plasmas being a tad heavy or a little too thirsty on the juice (all of Panasonic’s Viera HDTVs are Energy Star qualified), but those gripe fall on my deaf ears when I can enjoy the sort of contrast and clarity that only a plasma can produce.

panasonic-tc-p42x1-viera-plasma-hdtv-portsYou guys know me well enough by now to guess that I’m not going to endorse any HDTV or monitor that can’t keep up with next-gen gaming consoles. Some sets just don’t jive with the graphical demands of today’s systems, often producing horrid lag or motion-blur. I’m glad to say that the Panasonic plasma suffers from no such problems. Again, it’s capabilities are pitch perfect. It even features a preconfigured “game” mode that optimizes the graphic settings for game play. Some users might spend time tweaking the unit’s picture settings to achieve the best results for movies, sports, or games, but I found the presets and out-of-the-box alignment to be more than workable.

Rounding out the important performance details, all of Panasonic’s 2009 line falls under the Viera designation, meaning that compatible devices (DVD players, Blu-ray players, and video recorders) are preconfigured to operate using the same remote. The Viera features also include a built-in SD card reader and photo viewing software, so you can experience your lens work on a worthy screen. Though most of you would likely pair any television of this caliber with a comparable home theater system, should your budgetary or space constraints preclude you from doing so, you’ll find the sound produced by the TC-P42X1 to be more than you’d otherwise expect for a flat-panel TV; it will definitely suffice in a pinch. As for inputs, there are plenty. Connectivity concerns are nonexistent.

Before testing the TC-P42X1, I had a pretty good idea of what I was getting into. Having used it to watch and play a variety of source material over the last month as only strengthened my opinion that it is a rock-solid HDTV. What I was not prepared for, however, was the aesthetic pleasure that the unit is. Last year’s Panny plasmas were a tad, how do I say… boxy. This unit is wrapped in a subtly curved frame whose glossy, piano black finish is a perfect compliment to the black hole of darkness produced by the set’s non-glare screen.

In conclusion, I want to be clear; the Panasonic TC-P42X1 is the company’s entry-level plasma HDTV. It’s also freaking great. Look below at the price. Then look at that blank space on your wall. Then look again at the price. Yes, it’s in US dollars. As a guy who is constantly scouring every electronics review and deal website known to man, I’m telling you true - it just doesn’t get any better than this. Enjoy the show.

Cost: $700 | $900 (TC-P50X1)

panasonic-tc-p42x1-viera-plasma-hdtv-lead-image

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
Read More About: , , ,



This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

21 Comments »

  • Roan says:

    Fantastic review of a great product, Dusty.

    A small technical detail. The human eye is most certainly capable of discerning the difference between 720p and 1080p on screens smaller than 50". One just needs to be at the correct viewing difference.

    With a 42" screen you will need be be over 8' away from the screen in order not to benefit from 1080p; and almost 10' for a 52" screen.

    The Panasonic Viera series are indeed the best value on the market today. I definitely prefer mine over my previous Kuro.

  • As Is says:

    I appreciate ya Dusty, that was very helpful. I have been looking at these things for the past month or so and was curious about the 1080p thing and processor speed. For whatever reason, I refuse to get anything under 120Hz (maybe because it sounds like they threw an early 90's PC under the hood)-what, exactly, IS the best speed for gaming and/or watching sports? Also, what do you think about the models with Vieracast? Oh, and nice shot of Morneau -Go. Twins.

    • Dusty Overby says:

      I orchestrated that shot of Morneau specifically to appeal to any Twins fans out there. Well, maybe not, but glad you liked it.

      As for the Hz business, 120Hz is a rating typically associated with LCD TVs; it describes their refresh rate. Panasonic is offering a 600Hz sub-field drive to counter that, which seems to be a sort of refresh-interlacing. This site describes it a bit further: http://www.tvlampsnbulbs.com/2009/03/what-does-60... I'm mainly interested in its practical result, which I have no problem with on this set; I have watched a lot of sports and played a lot of video games on this set without any trace of lag, ghosting, or motion blur, which would be the problems associated with a less than desirable refresh rate. I'd love to hear others chime in on this.

      As for Viera Cast, the integration with Google, Picasa, and YouTube definitely look promising. I haven't gotten to test this directly, though, so I can't give a hands-on impression.

  • Dusty Overby says:

    Thanks for the word! Indeed, you are right to make the distinction. The invisible caveat there should probably say, "…you (most people) simply can't tell the difference (from the recommended viewing distance)." I know there are several schools of thought on what exactly that distance is (2x the diagonal of the screen, 3x the width of the screen, blah blah blah), but I'll include this chart from Crutchfield as a help - http://tinyurl.com/kn2l5r.

    I'm someone who's typically been obsessed with buying products that feature the latest and greatest performance standards. That me has had to come to terms with the me who has a family and is living in the midst of a recession, thus, I'm all about value. I think we both agree that this is a pretty darn good one. At the moment, this set can be found at an even better price than the one listed above http://tinyurl.com/lg55jw.

  • Dusty Overby says:

    Thanks for the word! Indeed, you are right to make the distinction. The invisible caveat there should probably say, "…you (most people) simply can't tell the difference (from the recommended viewing distance)." I know there are several schools of thought on what exactly that distance is (2x the diagonal of the screen, 3x the width of the screen, blah blah blah), but I'll include this chart from Crutchfield as a help - http://tinyurl.com/kn2l5r.

    I'm someone who's typically been obsessed with buying products that feature the latest and greatest performance standards. That me has had to come to terms with the me who has a family and is living in the midst of a recession, thus, I'm all about value. I think we both agree that this is a pretty darn good one. At the moment, this set can be found at an even better price than the one listed above http://tinyurl.com/lg55jw.

  • Dusty Overby says:

    Thanks for the word! Indeed, you are right to make the distinction. The invisible caveat there should probably say, "…you (most people) simply can't tell the difference (from the recommended viewing distance)." I know there are several schools of thought on what exactly that distance is (2x the diagonal of the screen, 3x the width of the screen, blah blah blah), but I'll include this chart from Crutchfield as a help - http://tinyurl.com/kn2l5r.

    I'm someone who's typically been obsessed with buying products that feature the latest and greatest performance standards. That me has had to come to terms with the me who has a family and is living in the midst of a recession, thus, I'm all about value. I think we both agree that this is a pretty darn good one. At the moment, this set can be found at an even better price than the one listed above http://tinyurl.com/lg55jw.

  • Dusty Overby says:

    Thanks for the word! Indeed, you are right to make the distinction. The invisible caveat there should probably say, "…you (most people) simply can't tell the difference (from the recommended viewing distance)." I know there are several schools of thought on what exactly that distance is (2x the diagonal of the screen, 3x the width of the screen, blah blah blah), but I'll include this chart from Crutchfield as a help - http://tinyurl.com/kn2l5r.

    I'm someone who's typically been obsessed with buying products that feature the latest and greatest performance standards. That me has had to come to terms with the me who has a family and is living in the midst of a recession, thus, I'm all about value. I think we both agree that this is a pretty darn good one. At the moment, this set can be found at an even better price than the one listed above http://tinyurl.com/lg55jw.

  • Dusty Overby says:

    Thanks for the word! Indeed, you are right to make the distinction. The invisible caveat there should probably say, "…you (most people) simply can't tell the difference (from the recommended viewing distance)." I know there are several schools of thought on what exactly that distance is (2x the diagonal of the screen, 3x the width of the screen, blah blah blah), but I'll include this chart from Crutchfield as a help - .” target=”_blank”>.” target=”_blank”>Reply to this comment »

  • Roan says:

    There are 2 school of thought on the optimal distance to the screen.

    1. The SMPTE and THX standard.

    The SMPTE recommend a 30° angle on the horizontal plane, which equates to ~1.9 x screen width (not diagonal size). The THX is 26° - 26°, which equates to ~2.2 - 1.54 x screen width.

    2. The Visual Acuity of the human eye.

    The normal human eye can resolve details at 1 MOA. Which means at 3600 inches the human eye can discern detail down to 1.047197551".

    The distances I presented above were based on the visual acuity of a normal human eye with 20/20 vision. A 42" screen is 36.60617206" and 1,280 pixels wide; therefore each pixel is only 0.028598572" in size. Therefore to be able to fully benefit from 720p on a 42" screen, you will need to be closer than 98.31464828" or 8.2'.

  • Dusty Overby says:

    Thanks for the word! Indeed, you are right to make the distinction. The invisible caveat there should probably say, "…you (most people) simply can't tell the difference (from the recommended viewing distance)." I know there are several schools of thought on what exactly that distance is (2x the diagonal of the screen, 3x the width of the screen, blah blah blah), but I'll include this chart from Crutchfield as a help - .” target=”_blank”>.” target=”_blank”>Reply to this comment »

  • Dusty Overby says:

    Thanks for the word! Indeed, you are right to make the distinction. The invisible caveat there should probably say, "…you (most people) simply can't tell the difference (from the recommended viewing distance)." I know there are several schools of thought on what exactly that distance is (2x the diagonal of the screen, 3x the width of the screen, blah blah blah), but I'll include this chart from Crutchfield as a help - .” target=”_blank”>.” target=”_blank”>Reply to this comment »

  • Dusty Overby says:

    Thanks for the word! Indeed, you are right to make the distinction. The invisible caveat there should probably say, "…you (most people) simply can't tell the difference (from the recommended viewing distance)." I know there are several schools of thought on what exactly that distance is (2x the diagonal of the screen, 3x the width of the screen, blah blah blah), but I'll include this chart from Crutchfield as a help - .” target=”_blank”>.” target=”_blank”>Reply to this comment »

  • Dusty Overby says:

    I orchestrated that shot of Morneau specifically to appeal to any Twins fans out there. Well, maybe not, but glad you liked it.

    As for the Hz business, 120Hz is a rating typically associated with LCD TVs; it describes their refresh rate. Panasonic is offering a 600Hz sub-field drive to counter that, which seems to be a sort of refresh-interlacing. This site describes it a bit further: http://www.tvlampsnbulbs.com/2009/03/what-does-60... I'm mainly interested in its practical result, which I have no problem with on this set; I have watched a lot of sports and played a lot of video games on this set without any trace of lag, ghosting, or motion blur, which would be the problems associated with a less than desirable refresh rate. I'd love to hear others chime in on this.

    As for Viera Cast, the integration with Google, Picasa, and YouTube definitely look promising. I haven't gotten to test this directly, though, so I can't give a hands-on impression.

  • Dusty Overby says:

    Roan,
    Thanks for the additional info. I am particularly impressed by your refusal to yield to any arcane suggestion that fewer than 8 decimal places make for an acceptable calculation. Stay strong, brother!

  • Henry says:

    Thank you for the great review.

    I just bought the TC-P42X1 last night and tested several sources, including DVD and Blu-ray through the HDMI input. I noticed no real visual difference between it and any other quality non-600 Hz sub-field plasma TV — it was about as clear, smooth, and sharp as I would expect from a good TV.

    On the other hand, I DO visually notice a difference in the 120 Hz LCD panels. The extra interpoloated frame makes for an almost artificially clear, smooth, and sharp experience. It's an experience one might like or dislike…I happen to like it, so I was disappointed the "600 Hz" showed no real noticeable difference for me, and I felt a little tricked by Panasonic's marketting department. This is a really new feature with little info on the web.

    Have said these things, however, this TV is an excellent viewing experience. It physically looks great. And at a current sale price of $599, is very hard to beat by any 42" plasma. I will keep it because I don't think I can find a better TV for something in this price range.

  • Turner Brown says:

    I just got mine TODAY… paid $599 bukarooosssssssss!!!!!

  • Henry says:

    I ended up returning mine. I was disappointed with the brightness / contrast control levels. Changing the brightness from 0 -100 does almost nothing. At 100% contrast and 100% brightness, it only acheived about 85% the brightness of my 55 inch Sony LCD projection (at nominal settings). The picture always looks a little dark and when I bring up a white picture, the white is noticeably grayish. I don't think this is acceptable as a new TV, especially if you're using it in a bright room. In the long term there will be no margin for improvement if the screen begins to darken from use.

  • Henry says:

    The other thing that bothered and confused me is a "Black Level" setting. Changing it to "light" appears to bump up the overall black level range. It shows more detail in a dark movies such as Dark City or Underworld. Changing it to "dark" does the opposite. Why does such a setting exist? Plasmas are suppose to have the higher contrast advantage over LCDs and shouldn't suffer from lost details of dark scenes. It leads me to think the dynamic range of this TV isn't really that great, despite what the literature says.

    Because of this and because the touted 600 Hz feature showed no discernable motion improvement (despite what their website says here: http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/su... I decided to return the TV.

  • Derek says:

    Henry, ALL plasmas are darker than LCDs. LCDs are backlit. If your room is bright, or you simply like a super bright image, you just aren't going to be happy with any plasma.

  • Nice looking blog. Which template are you using? Nice post as well!

  • Leave a comment!

    Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

    Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

    You can use these tags:
    <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.